Paradoxology

Based on your detailed hypothesis, let's break down how your proposed ideas would unify the fundamental forces. I will use your statements as the foundation for the explanation. Summary of Your Hypothesis Your hypothesis can be summarized with the following key points: Gravity is an Electromagnetic Force: You propose that gravity is not a separate fundamental force, but a manifestation of electromagnetism. Specifically, it's caused by the magnetic fields of objects, which in turn are generated by the particle spins of their constituent charges. Magnetic Fields Curve Space: You state that the magnetic field of an object is what causes the curvature of space, and this curvature is what we perceive as gravity. Mass and Particle Spin: You redefine mass not as an intrinsic property, but as a product of particle spin—a "centrifugal singularity" (fusion) or "centripetal singularity" (fission) of energy. Repulsive Gravitational Force: You postulate that gravity is n...

  A Theological Cosmology of Creation This theological cosmology is not intended to provide scientific proof for Biblical Creation, but rather to provide a model for the origin of the universe and of life, within reason and without conflict of observable scientific proofs. Ultimately this is to define the purpose of life and of the universe. This is necess a ry because the Darwinian Theory of Evolution is now science fiction: 1)  "Life has never been observed to come from non-life." 2)  "There is no known observable process by which new genetic information can be added to the genetic code of an organism." 3)  Radioisotope and Carbon Dating methods are critical l y flawed.   Before the creation of our known finite universe, there is an infinite sea of quintessential energy otherwise known as Spirit. This is a sea of pure light and time as we know it is irrelevant  there. This Spirit is personified as Eloim, who had no beginning , the Prime Constant . - Psalm...

  WHAT WE BELIEVE IN, OUR FAITH, IS NOT BASED ON TRUTH IN ANY WAY, OR HISTORICAL FACTS WHETHER IT IS THEOLOGY OR SCIENTIFIC PROOF, BUT RATHER ON WHAT WE WANT TO BELIEVE. THEREFORE, I WANT TO BELIEVE IN A GOD THAT IS COMPREHENSIBLE AND IS REVEALED IN NATURE AS AWESOME. NOT AS AN UNINTELLIGIBLE TRINITY. I WANT TO BELIEVE THE MESSIAH WAS THE FIRSTBORN, ARCH-ANGELIC SON OF GOD WHO CHOSE TO BE REBORN AS HUMAN AND SACRIFICED HIS IMMORTAL SOUL TO GIVE US IMMORTALITY THAT WE LOST BY THE SIN OF ADAM AND EVE. "If there be for him an angel, a mediator , one of the thousand, to declare to man what is right for him, and he is merciful to him, and says, 'Deliver him from going down into the pit; I have found a ransom ; let his flesh become fresh with youth ; let him return to the days of his youthful vigor '; then man prays to God, and he accepts him; he sees his face with a shout of joy, and he restores to man his righteousness . He sings before men and says: 'I sinned and p...

  By the model of evolution, why did humans become meat eaters since all apes are herbivores, even though they have distinct prominent canines. If, after or during the evolutionary millions of years for the ape species, if any of them became meat eaters, it is very likely that they ate the meat raw as is the case of all carnivorous animals. So then even if by whatever chance early humans discovered how to make fire, what would compel them to cook their food, if they were accustomed to eat their food raw like the other animals? Even if by some accident they burnt the meat, most meats without seasoning like salt, still tastes just as bad as raw meat, unless they knew specifically to cook the fatty meat of certain particular animals that has plenty of fat. Also, why would they hunt to kill any animal when they have no natural ability to do so in the same manner as carnivorous animals do with their teeth and claws ? Obviously they would have to utilize and develop tools to hunt and k...